Lawrence Krauss: Teaching Creationism is Child Abuse

It amazes me that people have pre-existing
notions that defy the evidence of reality. But that they hold onto them so dearly. And
one of them is the notion of creationism, or. in fact, Senator Marco Rubio, who’s
presumably a reasonably intelligent man and maybe even educated, was asked what’s the
age of the Earth, and ultimately, either because he actually believed it or he was trying to
appeal to some constituency, had to argue that it’s a big mystery, that somehow we
should teach kids both ideas, that the Earth is 6,000 years old and that it’s 4.55 billion
years old, which is what it is. If you think about that, somehow saying that,
well, anything goes, we shouldn’t offend religious beliefs by requiring kids to know – to understand
reality; that’s child abuse. And if you think about it, teaching kids – or allowing
the notion that the earth is 6,000 years old to be promulgated in schools is like teaching
kids that the distance across the United States is 17 feet. That’s how big an error it is. Now you might say, look, a lot of people believe
that, so don’t we owe it to them to allow their views to be present in school? Well,
as I’ve often said, the purpose of education is not to validate ignorance but to overcome
it. Fifty percent of the people in the United States, when we probe them each year with
the National Science Foundation, think that the sun goes around the Earth, not that the
Earth goes around the sun. When we asked the question – we provide the question: The Earth
goes around the sun and takes a year to do it; true or false? Almost every year, 50 percent
of the people get that wrong. Now, does that mean in schools we should allow
the anti-Galilean and Copernican idea that the sun goes around the Earth to be taught?
Absolutely not. If, in fact, the very fact that people don’t know that, and the very
fact that enough people are willing to somehow believe that Earth is 6,000 years old, means
we have to do a better job of teaching physics and biology, not a worse job. The last thing we want to do is water down
the teaching of biology because some people don’t recognize that evolution happened.
Evolution is the basis of modern biology and, in fact, if a lot of people don’t believe
it, it only means we have to do a better job teaching it. So once again, I repeat, the
purpose of education is not to validate ignorance, but to overcome it. And to overcome a situation
where a United States Senator can speak such manifest nonsense with impunity is vitally
important to the healthy future of our society. Technology and biotechnology will be the basis
of our economic future. And if we allow nonsense to be promulgated in the schools, we do a
disservice to our students, a disservice to our children, and we’re guaranteeing that
they will fall behind in a competitive world that depends upon a skilled workforce able
to understand and manipulate technology and science.